KADVABHAI KURJIBHAI VARSANI,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF THE INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, RAJKOT
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal pertains to the denial of rebate under Section 87A by the CPC, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that the adjustment made by the CPC went beyond the scope of Section 143(1) and that the CIT(A) failed to consider submissions and evidence.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for rebate under Section 87A even if the income includes short-term capital gains taxable under Section 111A, provided the total income does not exceed Rs. 7,00,000 and the assessee opted for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A). The denial by the CPC was based on system logic, not statutory mandate.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is admissible for tax on short-term capital gains under Section 111A for an assessee opting for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A) with total income below Rs. 7,00,000.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 111A,Section 115BAC(1A),Section 143(1),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “Smc”
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2024-25, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, ADDL/JCIT (A)-4, Delhi, dated 11.11.2025, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Centralized Processing Cell (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) u/s. 143(1) of the Act on 24.02.2025. ITA No. 125/Rjt/2026 – A.Y. 2024-25 Kadv
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026