SRI BADRIKA ASHRAM CUM CHARITABLE AND SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, CR BUILDING
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) failed to confront the assessee with the specific issues regarding its classification as a religious entity and the denial of 80G approval. The Tribunal noted that no factual examination of financial statements was done to support these conclusions.
What were the facts?
The assessee-trust sought registration under Section 12AB(1)(b) and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemption) granted registration classifying the assessee as a 'Religious Entity' and denied 80G approval, citing religious activities in its objects. The assessee contended it was a charitable trust and not engaged in religious activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in classifying the trust as a 'Religious Entity' without proper confrontation and factual basis, and whether the denial of 80G approval was justified without considering the proviso regarding religious expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेश/Order PER RAJESH DAMODARLAL SHARMA, J.M:
Aforesaid appeals by assessee are connected appeals. First, we take up ITA No.507/Chandi/2026 which arises out of an order passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [CIT(E)] on 03-02-2026 granting registration to the assessee-trust u/s 12AB(1)(b) for AYs 2027-28 to 2031-32. The only grievance of the assessee is that it has been accorded the status of Religious En
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)
- Sat Guru Saran Niwas Trust, Agra vs CIT(Exemption), AgraITA 674/AGR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026