DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, GUWAHATI vs. AROMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, ASSAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 10CCB was due to technical glitches and substantial compliance was made before filing the return. It further noted that Section 143(1)(a)(ii) does not permit disallowance for delayed filing of such a form as it's not an 'apparent incorrect claim'.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80-IE but faced technical difficulties uploading the required Form 10CCB by the due date. The form was eventually uploaded before filing the return of income, but the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction under Section 143(1)(a)(ii).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80-IE for delayed filing of Form 10CCB is permissible under Section 143(1)(a)(ii) when the delay was due to technical issues and substantial compliance was made.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, – GUWAHATI BENCH
Before: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
The present appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 26.12.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT(A)] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) for the assessment year 2022-23. 2. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing IMFL, and commercial production commenced from 28.08.2014. Therefore, the assessee became eligible for deduction u/s 80-IE of the Act for a period of 10 years from the initial assessment year 2015-16 and has consis
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80-IE
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Incometax Officer, Ward-1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 465/GTY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 423/GTY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Pawan Parakh, Bongaigaon vs PCIT, Guwahati -1, GuwahatiITA 85/GTY/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2020-2021
- Bagrodia Plantations and Industries Pvt… vs ITO Ward 1(1) Dib, Aayakar BhawanITA 152/GTY/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Heavy Vehicles Factory Employees Coop… vs ITO, Ncw-7(3), ChennaiITA 3577/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed27 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026