PAWAN PARAKH,BONGAIGAON vs. PCIT, GUWAHATI -1, GUWAHATI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that after the amendment to Section 80AC, filing the return within the due date is mandatory for claiming deductions under Chapter VI-A. Therefore, the PCIT's order disallowing the deduction was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80-IE for AY 2020-21, which was allowed by the Assessing Officer. However, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) invoked Section 263, holding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to a 5-day delay in filing the return of income.
What were the issues?
Whether a delay in filing the return of income, even if minor, disentitles the assessee from claiming deduction under Section 80-IE after the amendment of Section 80AC?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Guwahati-1 [“the Ld. PCIT(A)”, for short], dated 31.03.2025 with DIN & Order No: ITBA/REV/F/REV5/2024-25/1075333573(1) passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the assessment year 2020-21 on the following grounds of Appeal: -
For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Order dated 31.03.2025 passed by PCIT, Guwahati-1, u/s 263 of The Pawan Parakh; A.Y: 2020-21 Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") disallowing the claim of exemption u/s 801E amounting Rs. 2,79,00,747/- taken by the appellate for delay of 5 days in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80-IE
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Incometax Officer, Ward-1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 465/GTY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 423/GTY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Bagrodia Plantations and Industries Pvt… vs ITO Ward 1(1) Dib, Aayakar BhawanITA 152/GTY/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central… vs Aroma India Private Limited, AssamITA 48/GTY/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2022-23
- Heavy Vehicles Factory Employees Coop… vs ITO, Ncw-7(3), ChennaiITA 3577/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed27 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026