AIR TRAVEL ENTERPRISES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
What were the facts?
A search was conducted on the assessee, an air travel agency, leading to assessment orders for multiple years. Additions were made primarily based on tax audit reports and not on specific incriminating material found during the search.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for concluded assessment years, additions can only be made based on incriminating material found during search. Since no such material was presented, the additions made solely on tax audit reports were deleted.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made solely on the basis of tax audit reports are valid for concluded assessment years when no incriminating material was found during a search? Whether the assessment year 2015-16 was abated?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 36(1)(va),Section 2(24)(x),Section 43B(f),Section 14A,Section 43B(b),Section 2(22)(e),Section 244A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT
These are 6 Appeals filed by Air Travel Enterprises Pvt Ltd (the Assessee/ Appellant) arising out of the search for the various Assessment Years involving common issue and therefore these are disposed of by a common order.
ITA No. 138/Coch/2026 is filed by assessee against Appellate Order passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) – 3, Kochi dated 05.12.2025 wherein the Appeal filed by the Assessee against the Assessment Order dated 29.12.2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, C
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026