M/S ASHOK PETROL CO.,INDORE vs. THE ITO - 2(1), INDORE, INDORE
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file its return of income for AY 2020-21. Penalties were levied under sections 271A and 271B for failure to maintain books of account and get accounts audited, respectively. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeals ex-parte due to non-prosecution.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals ex-parte without proper adjudication, especially since notices were sent to an incorrect email address and a written submission with documents was not considered. The substantive grounds of appeal were also not adjudicated.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeals ex-parte without considering the evidence and adjudicating the grounds of appeal, and whether the penalties under sections 271A and 271B were validly levied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271A,Section 271B,Section 44AA,Section 44AB,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
PER ARVIND SONI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against
the impugned orders dated 25.11.2025 and 03.12.2025 passed
by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi
[hereinafter referred to as "the ld. CIT(A)"] for Assessment Year
ITANo.10 & 121/Ind/2026 M/s. Ashok Petrol Co.
2020-21 arising out of order framed under section 271A and 271B respectively of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act").
The assessee, a firm, had not filed its Return of Income for the AY 2020-21. In this case, information was flagged under Risk Management Strategy formulated by the CBDT
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271A
- Kamaljeet Singh, Rupnagar, Punjab vs ACIT Circle 1(1) Chandigarh, ChandigarhITA 426/CHANDI/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Thakorbhai Jagdishbhai Patel, Panchmahals… vs Income Tax Officer, Godhra, PanchmahalsITA 1248/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Swajan Foundation, Lucknow vs Income Tax Officer (Exemption), LucknowITA 790/LKW/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Swajan Foundation, Lucknow vs Income Tax Officer (Exemption), LucknowITA 790/LKW/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Ram Lal Narwani, Jaipur vs ITO Ward. 6(1), JaipurITA 32/JPR/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026