ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IA(4) for profits from infrastructure projects executed as part of a Joint Venture/Consortium. The Assessing Officer disallowed this, arguing the agreements were with the JV and not the assessee directly. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee acted as a 'developer' of infrastructure facilities, not merely a 'works contractor', due to its involvement in investigation, design, procurement, construction, and post-construction operations, along with bearing financial risks. Therefore, the deduction under Section 80IA(4) was admissible.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, as a constituent of a Joint Venture/Consortium, is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4) for infrastructure projects, and whether it qualifies as a 'developer' rather than a 'works contractor'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IA(4),Section 153A,Section 132,Section 143(2),Section 139,Section 115JB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Sood
PER. RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the respective orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (for short, “CIT(A)” dated 18.01.2025 and 31.01.2025, which, in turn, arises from the respective orders passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”) dated 07.05.2021 and 29.04.2021 for the Assessment Year 2017-18 and Assessment Year 2018- 19, respectively. As the captioned appeals involve common issues, they are ACIT vs. Navayuga Engine
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA(4)
- Bombay Highway Carriers Private Limited… vs ITO Ward 5 (1), DelhiITA 6863/DEL/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central… vs Megha Engineering Infrastructures Limited…ITA 6273/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Cicago Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ACIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 994/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: Heard1 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Gl Constructions Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 1(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2429/MUM/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2024-25
- Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S. Gharpure Engineering & Construction P…ITA 1042/PUN/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026