DCIT, CIRCLE 1(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. NKGSB CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowances related to bad debts and other expenses. The assessee, a co-operative bank, had claimed deductions for bad debts written off and other expenses.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had erred in deleting the bad debt disallowance without appreciating the amendments to Section 36(1)(vii). The Tribunal also remanded issues concerning staff welfare expenses and long-term capital gains for fresh consideration by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of bad debts written off was correctly deleted by the CIT(A) considering amendments to the Income Tax Act. Whether certain expenses and capital gains were correctly treated by the AO and CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(vii),Section 36(1)(viia),Section 36(2)(v),Section 14A,Section 37,Section 45,Section 271(1)(c),Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.M.] :- The above captioned appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the orders of even date passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi
P a g e | 2 ITA No. 7552, 7591 & 7592/Mum/2025 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2020-21 NKGSB Cooperative Bank Limited [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to the assessment orders passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(vii)
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ITO-41.3.4, Mumbai vs Urmila Syntex, MumbaiITA 2458/MUM/2026[2013]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026
- Dar Housing Limited, Nct of Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle- 15, DelhiITA 1881/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Small Industries Development Bank of India… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9170/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026