KIRAN JAIN, AMBIKAPUR,AMBIKAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMBIKAPUR, AMBIKAPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee sold a capital asset and claimed deduction under Section 54F for constructing a new house. However, the deduction was denied because the new house was registered in the name of the assessee's husband, not the assessee.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the land sold was a capital asset as it was situated within the Municipal Corporation. It further held that the deduction under Section 54F should not be denied on hyper-technical grounds, especially when the source of capital gain and investment in the new asset are not disputed.
What were the issues?
Whether the land sold qualifies as a capital asset, and whether deduction under Section 54F can be denied solely because the new asset is registered in the name of the assessee's husband.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 01.01.2026 for the assessment year 2014-15 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
In this case, the assessee had sold capital asset for an amount of Rs.36,09,400/- and immediately started construction of house for an amount of Rs.33,80,000/- as evident from certificate given by Engineer. The new constructed house was registere
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 54F
- DCIT, Circle-1(3), Surat, Adajan vs Mahendrakumar Varjangbhai Jilaria, Ambika…ITA 777/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Rajbir Kaur Athwal Legal Heir of Late Sh… vs Jao ITO Ward-3 Yamunanagar the Income Tax…ITA 1821/CHANDI/2025[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Beeram Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle -2(1), HyderabadITA 952/HYD/2026[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Vikram Singh, Etawah vs Ward 2(2)(5), Etawah, Civil LinesITA 429/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Vikram Singh, Etawah vs Ward 2(2)(5), Etawah, Civil LinesITA 429/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026