ANNAI BUILDERS REAL ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CRICLE 3(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
A search and seizure operation was conducted on the assessee, a flat promotion company. Subsequently, assessment orders under Section 153A were passed based on a Special Audit Report analyzing seized Tally data. The assessment years involved were 2012-13 to 2016-17, which were unabated at the time of the search.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Tally data seized during the search, which was already part of the company's reported financials, did not constitute incriminating material. A Special Audit Report analyzing this data, prepared after the search, also cannot be treated as incriminating material for sustaining search assessments in unabated cases.
What were the issues?
Whether the Tally data seized during a search, and a subsequent Special Audit Report analyzing it, constitute 'incriminating material' to justify assessment under Section 153A for unabated assessment years.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 142(2A),Section 245C(1),Section 245D(1),Section 139,Section 132,Section 36(1)(vii),Section 40A(3),Section 40A(3A),Section 40(a)(ia)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER BENCH :
The above batch of 5 (five) appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order(s) of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 20, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ld. CIT(A)'), for the Assessment Years (AY) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), vide common order date
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Veera Mani Kumar Vatti Kooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1069/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITA 80/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 22/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 21/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026