SINDH CO. OP. CREIDT SOCIETY LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest income from cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). For interest from nationalized banks, the matter was set aside to the AO to consider only the net interest income after allowing for expenses.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned from cooperative and nationalized banks. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the entire interest income, leading to an addition. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income from cooperative banks is deductible under Section 80P(2)(d) and whether deduction for interest from nationalized banks should be on net income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) (in short “CIT(A)”) dated 04.12.2025 for assessment year (A.Y.) 2020-21 in the proceeding under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act (in short “the Act”).
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed its return of income for A.Y. 2020-21 on 23.11.2020 declaring total income of Rs.3,74,620/-. The case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS.
ITA No.313/Ahd/2026 Sindh CO. OP. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. DY. Commissioner of Income Tax, AY 2020-21 2 In the course of assessment, the AO noticed that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs.38,00,341/- under Section 80P of the Act. On further inquiry, it transpired that the assessee had earned interest income on deposits with cooperative banks and nationalized banks, which was claimed as exempt under Section 80P of the Act. The total interest of income earned by the assessee was Rs.75,94,885/-. According to the AO this interest income did not qualify deduction under Section 80P (2)(a)/80P (2)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, the AO had made addition of Rs.75,94,885/- and the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act on 23.09.2022 at total income of Rs.79,69,505/-.
Aggrieved with the order of the AO, the assessee had filed an appeal before the first appellate authority which was decided by the Ld. CIT(A) vide the impugned order and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.
Now the assessee is in second appeal before us. The following grounds have been taken in this appeal:
“Erred in confirming addition of Rs.75,94,885/- under the head "Income from Other Sources" for interest income earned from Co. Op. Banks and Nationalised Banks. 2. Erred in law and on facts of the case in not allowing deduction U/s 80P of the Act. 3. Erred in law and on facts of the case in not allowing proportionate expenditure incurred for earning Income from Other Sources.
ITA No.313/Ahd/2026 Sindh CO. OP. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. DY. Commissioner of Income Tax, AY 2020-21 3 4. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify or change all or any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before the hearing of the appeal”
Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the interest received from cooperative banks was eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. She explained that the cooperative banks are registered as cooperative societies. Therefore, the interest received from cooperative banks was in the nature of interest derived from investment with other cooperative societies and such interest was eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In this regard she relied upon the decision of coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Ashapura Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. (178 taxmann.com 18). Regarding the interest received from scheduled banks, the Ld. AR submitted that the AO had disallowed the gross interest received from SBI and IDBI without allowing set off for the expenditure incurred by the assessee for earing that income. She explained that the assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80P of the Act in respect of net interest income only. Further, the AO in the assessment order for AY 2016-17 had also given a finding that only the net interest income from nationalized banks does not qualify for deduction under Section 80P of the Act.
Per contra, Shri Abhijit, the Ld. SR-DR submitted that the cooperative banks which are commercially run cannot be considered as cooperative society. Further that the gross interest income from scheduled banks was rightly disallowed under Section 80P as the assessee was
ITA No.313/Ahd/2026 Sindh CO. OP. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. DY. Commissioner of Income Tax, AY 2020-21 4 unable to establish the nexus of the expenses incurred with the earning of the interest income.
We has carefully considered the rival submissions. So far as the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest received from cooperative banks is concerned, this issue is no longer res integra. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Ashwin Kumar Urban Cooperative Society Ltd. (168 taxmann.com 314)(Gujarat) has held that the cooperative bank is the cooperative society registered under Gujarat State Cooperative Societies Act and accordingly deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act was admissible to the interest derived from cooperative banks. Accordingly, the AO is directed to allow the deduction claimed under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of net interest derived from the two cooperative banks.
As regarding interest received form SBI and IDBI is concerned, this interest does not qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. However, it is found that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs.38,00,341/- only under Section 80P of the Act in its return of income, as against gross interest of Rs.75,94,885/-. Thus, the deduction claim was not in respect of gross interest but for net interest only. Further, in the assessment order for AY 2016-17, copy of which has been brought on record in the paper-book, the AO had held that only the net interest income from nationalized banks would not qualify for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. In view of this position, we deem it proper to set aside the matter to file of Jurisdictional AO with a direction to disallow only in the net interest income derived from the scheduled banks (SBI and IDBI). The AO
ITA No.313/Ahd/2026 Sindh CO. OP. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. DY. Commissioner of Income Tax, AY 2020-21 5
will be free to verify the correctness of net interest income as disclosed by the assessee. Accordingly, the ground taken by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
In result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the Court on 20/05/2026 at Ahmedabad.
Sd/- Sd/- (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL) (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated – 20th May, 2026 (True Copy) H.C. PS आदेश आदेश क� आदेश आदेश क� क� �ितिलिप क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अ�ेिषत 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण / DR, ITAT, 6. गाड� फाईल /Guard file. आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) उप उप/सहायक उप उप सहायक सहायक पंजीकार सहायक पंजीकार पंजीकार आयकर अपीलीय आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026