ACIT-6(1)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. IMPERIAL CONSULTANTS AND SECURITIES LIMITED, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order regarding disallowances and interest expenditure. However, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved a resolution plan for the assessee, extinguishing all prior liabilities and demands of the Income-tax Department.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the NCLT and implemented by the Assessing Officer, all claims not forming part of the plan stand extinguished. Therefore, no live dispute survives for adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether a tax appeal survives when the underlying tax demand has been extinguished by an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 57(iii),Section 36(1)(iii),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 156A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT BEENA PILLAI & SHRI JAGADISH
Per: SHRI JAGADISH, A.M.:
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), arising from the assessment order dated 29.12.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) read with section 144C of the Act for the assessment year 2014-15. Imperial Consultants and Securities Limited
The Revenue has raised ten grounds of appeal. Grounds nos. 1 to 4 challenge the deletion of disallowance of Rs.17,71,06,896/-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026