RAJASEHAR BUVANESWARI,PERAMBALUR vs. ITO, WARD 1, PERAMBALUR, PERAMBALUR
What were the facts?
The assessee acquired shares of a distressed company through an NCLT-supervised auction at Rs. 3.59 per share. Subsequently, the assessee sold some shares at Rs. 2.40 per share, declaring a short-term capital loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 50CA, deeming the fair market value at Rs. 104.917 per share based on a mechanical application of Rule 11UA, ignoring the company's liquidation status.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO mechanically applied Rule 11UA by not excluding unrealizable assets from the valuation. It further held that the fair market value should be based on the NCLT-supervised auction price of Rs. 3.59 per share, as it reflects the commercial reality of the distressed sale.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO erred in mechanically applying Rule 11UA for fair market value determination without considering the company's liquidation and unrealizable assets. Whether Section 50CA can be invoked to tax hypothetical gains disconnected from commercial realities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM : The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 17.09.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Delhi, National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as “ld.CIT(A)”), dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order dated 08.03.2025 passed u/s.147 r.w.s. 144/144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961
:-2-: ITA. No: 3332/Chny/2025 (hereinafter re
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50CA
- Arokiaswamy Velumani, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1946/MUM/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Kalaiyarasan Rajangam Mudaliar, Ahmedabad vs Assessing Officer, AhmedabadITA 2669/AHD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Anant Govind Patil, Virar vs Income Tax, ThaneITA 2785/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT-3(1)(1), Mumbai, Aayakar Bhawan vs Bhavna Bharat Daftary, MumbaiITA 9520/MUM/2025[2020]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026
- M/S. Vinant Trust, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 26(1), MumbaiITA 9325/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026