MALHOTRA WEIKFIELD FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following its own precedent in similar cases, restored the issue to the CIT(A)/NFAC. The CIT(A)/NFAC was directed to adjudicate the delay condonation and deal with the matter afresh in accordance with the law.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, received corpus donations which the AO treated as income due to lack of specific direction. The CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal due to a significant delay in filing, without condoning it. The assessee appealed this dismissal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A)/NFAC was justified in dismissing the appeal solely on grounds of delay without condoning it. Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 270A,Section 11(1)(d),Section 143(1),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 274,Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2. 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
6 ITA No.900/PUN/2026 Malhotra Weikfield Foundation
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 24.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before 25.06.2026 3 JM/AM the Second Member Draft discussed/approved by 25.06.2026 4 AM/AM Second Member Approved Draft comes to the 25.06.2026 5 Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk 25.06.2026 Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to 9 the Office Superintendent Date on which file goes to the 10 A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026