PRIMARC PRABHU DAYAL CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the application for 80G(5)(iii) registration in the interest of justice. The issue was restored to the CIT(Exemption) to decide on merits after giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) in Form 10AB electronically. The application was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) on the grounds of being filed beyond the prescribed time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the application for 80G(5)(iii) approval can be condoned and the matter decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRIPRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 12.12.2025.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the application for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was filed electronically on 20.06.2025 in form no. 10AB under Rule 17A of the IT Rules 1962, (Rules). Although, the assessee was granted provisional approval u/s 80G(5)(iv) of the Act in Form No.10AC by CPC, Bangalore vide order dated 22.06.2022, for a period of 22.06.2022 to A.Y. 2025-26. The ld. CIT(E) dismissed the
After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the application filed by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected on the ground of being application in form 10AB filed belatedly i.e. on 20.06.2025. In the interest of justice and fair play, we hereby condone the delay in filing the said application and restore the issue back to the file of the ld. CIT (E) with a direction to decide the same on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 25.06.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Kolkata, Dated: 25.06.2026 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT DR, ITAT, 4. 5. Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy//
Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026