SWAMI VIVEKANANDA GRAMONNAYAN KENDRA,MURSHIDABAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the application for 80G approval, considering it in the interest of justice. The issue was restored to the CIT(E) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) was rejected by the CIT(E) for being filed beyond the prescribed time limit. The assessee sought condonation of the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) has the power to condone the delay in filing an application for 80G approval, and if so, whether the delay should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 12.08.2025 for the AY 2025-26.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the application of the assessee for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) was electronically filed on 13.02.2025 in form no. 10AB under Rule 17A of the IT Rules 1962, (Rules). The ld. CIT(E) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the application in form 10AB was filed beyond the time limit for A.Y. 2022-23 to
The ld. DR on the other hand submitted that the CIT (E) did not have any power to condone the delay and thus, dismissal is the only to decide the application.
After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the application filed by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) was rejected on the ground being application in form 10AB filed belatedly i.e. on 13.02.2025. In the interest of justice and fair play, we hereby condone the delay and restore the issue back for granting of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act to the file of the ld. CIT (E) with a direction to decide on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 25.06.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Kolkata, Dated: 25.06.2026 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT DR, ITAT, 4. 5. Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy//
Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026