MAASIS INTER FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA,, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had correctly disclosed the long-term capital loss and had added it back to its income, not claiming it as a set-off against current year's income. The Tribunal noted that the sale was supported by documentation and a valuation report.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a private limited company, claimed a long-term capital loss of Rs. 6.34 crores on the sale of unquoted equity shares. The Assessing Officer disallowed this loss, treating it as non-genuine, and the CIT(A) upheld this decision. The assessee had disclosed the loss in its return but added it back to its income, intending to carry it forward.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of long-term capital loss was justified when the assessee had added it back to income and intended to carry it forward, and whether the assessment proceedings were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order
dated 23.03.2026 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC),
Delhi, passed under Section 143(3) of the Assessment Year 2022-23
of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The Brief facts of the case of the assessee is
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 74
- Yashpal Singh Yadav, Noida vs ACIT Circle-2(3)91), JhansiITA 443/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Jain Pravin Hiralal HUF, Pune vs ITO Ward 6(1), PuneITA 1072/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Gluhend India Private Limited, Delhi vs DCIT - 3(1)(1), MumbaiITA 271/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Wexford Spectrum Investors Mauritius…ITA 1914/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed10 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- Apoletto Asia Ltd., Mumbai vs DCIT (International Tax) 1(1)(1), MumbaiITA 3088/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026