ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-4(3)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. WEXFORD SPECTRUM INVESTORS MAURITIUS LIMITED, MAURITIUS
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, affirming that the assessee can choose to be taxed under the Act or the DTAA each year, and that previously allowed carry-forward of losses under the Act remains valid. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Mauritius-based company, claimed capital gains for AY 2015-16 as not taxable in India under the India-Mauritius DTAA and sought to carry forward earlier short-term capital losses without set-off. The AO initiated reassessment and proposed to set off brought-forward losses against current year capital gains.
What were the issues?
Whether brought-forward short-term capital losses can be carried forward when current year capital gains are claimed as exempt under a DTAA, and whether the assessee can adopt different tax treatments under the Act and DTAA in different years.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144C(3),Section 74,Section 10(38),Section 90(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण"ायपीठमुंबईम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM Asst. Commissioner of Income Wexford Spectrum Investors Tax (International Taxation) – Mauritius Limited C/o SRBC and Associates LLP, 14th Vs. 4(3)(2), Mumbai Room No.634, 6th floor, Kautilya floor, The Ruby, 29 Senapati Bapat Bhavan, BKC, Mumbai-400051 Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai-400028 PAN: AAACW7770L Revenue- अपीलाथ" / Appellant Assessee-""थ"/ Respondent :
C.O. No. 155/Mum/2026 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 1914/Mum/2026) (Assessment Year: 2015-16) Wexford Spectrum Investors Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Mauritius Limited (International Taxation) – 4(3)(2), C/o SRBC and Associates LLP, Mumbai Vs. 14th floor, The Ruby, 29 Senapati Room No.634, 6th floor, Kautilya Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Bhavan, BKC, Mumbai-400051 Mumbai-400028 PAN: AAACW7770L Assessee- अपीलाथ" / Appellant Revenue -""थ"/ Respondent :
Assesseeby : Shri Pranay Gandhi Revenueby : Ms. Shruti Anzare – Sr. DR : 13.05.2026 Date of Hearing : 10.08.2026 Date of Pronouncement
ITA No. 1914/Mum/2026 & CO No.155/Mum/2026 Wexford Spect
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026