CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LIMITED,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT/ACIT, SITAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest income from investments in banks, including FDRs and savings accounts, is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P as it is not derived from the primary business of providing credit facilities or assistance to cane growers. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of the validity of the notice issued by the Assessment Unit.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Cooperative Cane Development Union, claimed a deduction under Section 80P on its entire business income. The Assessing Officer noted discrepancies between reported business income, income from other sources, and interest received from investments. The assessee argued that interest income from bank deposits was attributable to its core business activities.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments with banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P, and the validity of a notice issued by the Assessment Unit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW ‘B’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 31.10.2025, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeals of the assessee against the orders of the Assessing Officer passed under section 143(3), for the A.Y. 2022-23, on 6.03.2024. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “(1) That Notice u/s 143(2) of I. T. Act has been issued by Assessment Unit.
Income Tax Department, dated 02-06-2023 who have no Juri iction to issue the same in view of CBDT Circular / Notification dated 29.03.2022 wherein it has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026