SOCIETY FOR HERITAGE & ECOLOGICAL RESEARCHES,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the application for 80G registration. The matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) to decide the issue on its merits after providing the assessee with a hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) in Form 10AB. The CIT(Exemption) dismissed the application solely on the grounds that it was filed beyond the prescribed time limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the application for 80G registration can be condoned and if the application should be decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRIPRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 18.11.2025.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the application of the assessee for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 the Act was filed on 20.10.2025 in form no. 10AB under Rule 17A of the IT Rules 1962, (Rules). The ld. CIT(E) dismissed the appeal of the assessee vide order dated 18.11.2025 on the ground that the
After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the application filed by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) in form 10AB was rejected on the ground being filed belatedly i.e. on 20.10.2025. In the interest of justice and fair play, we hereby condone the delay and restore the issue back for granting of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act to the file of the ld. CIT (E) with a direction to decide on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 29.06.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Kolkata, Dated: 29.06.2026 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026