SUNIL SAHADU KASAR,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, NASHIK
What were the facts?
The assessee received arrears of salary along with voluntary retirement compensation due to plant closure. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied relief under Section 89(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, stating it was not applicable to voluntary retirement compensation.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that even in cases of voluntary retirement compensation, the assessee is entitled to relief under Section 89(1) for arrears of salary received. The quantum of relief was not disputed and Form 10E was filed.
What were the issues?
Whether relief under Section 89(1) is admissible for arrears of salary received along with voluntary retirement compensation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2019-20 is directed against the order dated 06.03.2025 framed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi arising out of Assessment Order dated 23.03.2024 passed u/s.147 r.w.s.144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee requested for not pressing the legal issues raised in Grounds of appeal No.1 and 2 and the same are accordingly dismissed as ‘not pressed’.
In Ground No.3, the grievance of the assessee is that ld.CIT(A) erred in not granting relief u/s.89(1) of the Act at Rs,1,86,618/-.
2 Sunil Sahadu Kasar
Before me, ld. Counsel for the assessee referri
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 89(1)
- Vaishali Baban Bhosale, Pune vs The ITO Ward 10(1), PuneITA 2067/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Shri Venkataraman Krishnan, Chennai vs DCIT, Non Corp. Circle-19(1), ChennaiITA 2652/CHNY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Kashipur vs Income Tax Officer, KashipurITA 278/DDN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2016-17
- Tanaji Baburao Bhosale, Pune vs ITO Ward 10(1), PuneITA 1784/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed22 Jul 2026AY 2020-21
- Valangaiman Radhananda Kishore… vs ITO, Ncc-3(1), ChennaiITA 4099/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026