VAISHALI BABAN BHOSALE,PUNE vs. THE ITO WARD 10(1), PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed relief under Section 89(1) for arrear salary but filed Form 10E belatedly. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied the relief due to the delayed filing of Form 10E.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following coordinate bench decisions, held that mere delay in filing Form 10E should not result in denial of substantial relief if the entitlement otherwise exists. The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and grant of relief.
What were the issues?
Whether belated filing of Form 10E can lead to denial of relief under Section 89(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 02.03.2026 of the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A)-2, Bengaluru relating to assessment year 2018-19. 2. The only effective ground raised by the assessee in the appeal reads as under:
On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT has erred in not allowing relief u/s 89(1) of the Income tax Act, 1961 of Rs.3,46,766/- for not fling the Form 10E along with return of income and fling the same belatedly.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and derives income from salary as Principal of a school. She filed her return of income on 31.08.2018 declaring total income of Rs.20,24,790/-. The retu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 89(1)
- Shri Venkataraman Krishnan, Chennai vs DCIT, Non Corp. Circle-19(1), ChennaiITA 2652/CHNY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Kashipur vs Income Tax Officer, KashipurITA 278/DDN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2016-17
- Tanaji Baburao Bhosale, Pune vs ITO Ward 10(1), PuneITA 1784/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed22 Jul 2026AY 2020-21
- Valangaiman Radhananda Kishore… vs ITO, Ncc-3(1), ChennaiITA 4099/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Sunil Sahadu Kasar, Nashik vs Income Tax Office, NashikITA 1187/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Apr 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026