SHRI CHANDER CHINAR BADA AKHARA UDASEEN SOCIETY, AD GANDHI NAGAR JAMMU vs. EXEMTION WARD , JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that unrefunded student caution money is not taxable under Section 41(1) as it is neither a trading liability nor a business expense write-back. The addition of Rs. 56.95 lakhs was deleted, but the disallowance of excess interest paid to specified persons was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust running a hospital and medical college, claimed exemption under Section 11. The AO rejected the exemption and made additions, including Rs. 56.95 lakhs for unrefunded caution money under Section 41(1) and disallowance of excess interest paid to specified persons.
What were the issues?
Whether unrefunded caution money held by a charitable trust is taxable under Section 41(1) and whether interest paid to specified persons at 18% is excessive.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 41(1),Section 13(1)(c),Section 13(1)(d),Section 40A(2),Section 11,Section 12AA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 250 of the IT Act, 1961, ( henceforth the Act ) dated 20.02.2025 which has emanated from the order of AO, NFAC, Delhi, passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 27.12.2019. 2. The grounds of the appeal in Form 36 are as under:
“1 That the Id. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the order of the AO that the Trust has given undue benefits to the specified persons vide Para 5.3 Page 34 of the order of the CIT(A), Assessment Year: 2017-18 2
2 That the ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 41(1)
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 328/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 327/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 326/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 325/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026