AGRAWAL SABHA, RAJNANDGAON,RAJNANDGAON vs. EXEMPTION WARD 2,RAIPUR, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that actual conduct, not just a single bylaw, should determine the society's nature. It was held that the assessee deserved a reasonable opportunity to present its case before the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for renewal of registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and registration under section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(E) because the society's bylaws indicated it was established for the benefit of a particular caste, violating Section 13(1)(b). The assessee argued that a single bylaw shouldn't determine the overall nature and that their actual activities benefited the public at large.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration based on a single bylaw, without considering the assessee's actual activities, was justified. Whether the assessee was established for the benefit of a particular caste or the public at large.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM
Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.03.2026 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), [CIT(E)], Bhopal rejecting not only the renewal of registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) but also the registration under section 12AB of the Act.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026