PURE SPIRITSS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, DC/AC CIRCLE 2, PAT, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO to verify if there was any exempt income and, if not, to delete the disallowance under Section 14A. The disallowance of interest on delayed statutory dues was confirmed as penal in nature.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which upheld the disallowance of interest on delayed statutory dues and partly allowed disallowance under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer had made additions for violation of TDS provisions, interest on delayed statutory dues, and disallowance under Section 14A.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on delayed payment of statutory dues is a penal expenditure and not allowable as business expenditure. Whether disallowance under Section 14A should be made when there is no exempt income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA ‘DB’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Addl/JCIT(A)- Jodhpur [hereinafter referred to as Ld. ‘Addl/JCIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2017-18 dated 10.03.2026. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal:
"
The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC erred in law and on the facts of the case to affirm the order of the assessing officer on the disallowance made us 37(1) of the Act for Rs. 43,06,189. The Ld. CIT(A) NFAC erred in adjudicating and affirming with AO that interest on late payments
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026