THE JALGAON PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,JALGAON vs. ITO CIRCLE 1 JALGAON, JALGAON
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, appealed against additions made by the Assessing Officer and sustained partly by the CIT(A). The additions related to bad debts, festival/ceremony expenses, shareholder expenses, ex-gratia bonus, and dividend income.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matters to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. This was to allow for proper verification of facts, consideration of additional evidence, and to decide the issues afresh in accordance with law.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in sustaining additions related to bad debts, various expenses, and dividend income without proper factual verification and consideration of evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(vii)(a),Section 10(35),Section 115BBDA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 05.02.2025 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. There is delay of 3 days in filing of the present appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay duly supported by an affidavit that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for not filing the 2 appeal within the prescribed time limit. After hearing Ld. DR, we condone the delay of 3 days and proceed to adjudicate the appeal.
The appellant has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commis
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(35)
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 66/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shobha Harish Thawani, Mumbai vs DCIT - CC 8(4), MumbaiITA 5045/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Trc Engineering India Private Limited… vs ACIT, Circle-7(1)(1), BengaluruITA 1655/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Income Tax Officer 20(1)(1), Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Private Equity Sunrise Fund…ITA 4742/MUM/2026[2016]Status: Disposed26 Aug 2026
- Deven Chachra, New Delhi vs ACIT, Circle -22(2), New DelhiITA 2415/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026