DEVEN CHACHRA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE -22(2), NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order upholding the determination of income at Rs. 11,73,89,328/-. The assessee contended that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were barred by limitation.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act beyond 31.03.2022 were barred by limitation. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and the consequent demands were quashed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were barred by limitation, considering the amended provisions and the applicability of the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 151,Section 151A,Section 10(35),Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI
PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,AM:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 16.02.2026 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 raising following grounds of appeal :-
“1. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi has erred both in law and, on facts in upholding the determination of income made by the learned Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department of the appellant at Rs. 11,73,89,328/- as against declared income of Rs.4,10,24,650/- in an order of assessment dated 27.05.2023 u/s 147 of the Act read with section 144B of the Act.
2
That the lea
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chandan Patra, Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Corbett Kyari Jungle Resort vs. The State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S N B Enterprises vs. The Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Sumit Bhoora vs. M/ S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Jayesh Patel vs. M/S Aasharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026