SANTAJI URBAN CREDIT COOP SOCIETY LIMITED,PUSAD vs. ITO WARD - 1, YAVATMAL, YAVATMAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed a coordinate bench decision and a Bombay High Court ruling, holding that a belatedly e-verified return, if filed within the time specified in Section 139(4) and claiming deductions, should be considered valid for the purpose of allowing deductions. The order of the CIT(A) was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P. Although the original return was filed within the due date, it was e-verified beyond the stipulated period. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction on this ground, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether a deduction under Section 80P can be denied solely because the original return of income was e-verified after the due date, despite being filed within the prescribed time.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 250,Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR “SMC” BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ADDL/JCIT (Appeals)-1, Delhi (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 11/02/2026 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) which is arising out of intimation passed u/s. 143(1) of the Act dated 24.10.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19 (AY).
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The assessee is a Co- operative Society registered under the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960 and is engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members. The assessee filed its return of income on 31.08.2018 declaring Nil income
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026