PRAM BEER SINGH,MEERUT vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1) MEERUT, MEERUT
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed with a significant delay, which was condoned by the tribunal. The core issue involved the addition of long-term capital gains derived from the sale of land.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the agricultural lands sold by the assessee could not be treated as capital assets as per Section 2(14)(iii)(a) of the Act. Consequently, the addition of long-term capital gains was deleted.
What were the issues?
Whether agricultural land situated in a village with a population of less than 10,000 can be considered a capital asset for the purpose of calculating capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SH. SATBEER SINGH GODARA
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year: 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal Addl./JCIT(A)-5, Mumbai [in short, the Addl./JCIT(A)”], Mumbai DIN and Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024- 25/1071609917(1), dated 27.12.2024 involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the Act’).
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
The assessee’s delay of 350 days in filing of the instant appeal is condoned in light of his condonation averments/affidavit going unrebutted from the 2 Revenue side as well as in the light of Collector, Land & Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji & Others [1987] 167 ITR 471 (SC).
It transpires
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(14)(iii)(a)
- Kiran Jain, Ambikapur vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, AmbikapurITA 269/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed22 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- ACIT Central Circle 1(3), Ahmedabad vs Krupesh Jayantilal Patel, AhmedabadITA 921/AHD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
- Lalchand Narayan Bhakt, Jalna vs ITO Ward 2, JalnaITA 93/PUN/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed19 Dec 2025AY 2011-12
- Usha Yadav, Lucknow vs Income Tax Officer Range 6(2), LucknowITA 251/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2013-14
- Usha Yadav, Lucknow vs Income Tax Officer Range 6(2), LucknowITA 249/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026