STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAX) -4(2)(2), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, Standard Chartered Bank, a foreign bank operating in India, claimed substantial indirect and direct costs incurred by its overseas branches as deductible expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) examined these claims, particularly concerning the allocation of indirect costs and the allowability of direct costs.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the loss arising on year-end revaluation of outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts is an accrued trading loss and allowable as a deduction. Regarding direct costs, the Tribunal held that since the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business and a substantial portion was accepted by the TPO, the disallowance of the remaining direct expenditure was unjustified.
What were the issues?
Whether indirect costs allocated by overseas branches are deductible and whether direct costs incurred for the Indian branch are allowable as a deduction when a portion has been accepted by the TPO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
FIT FOR PUBLICATION
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई पीठ", मुंबई INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BENCH: I BEFORE HON’BLE BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA 4247 & 4275/MUM/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assmt. Year: 2004-05 & 2005-06) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK DCIT(IT)-4(2)(2) C 38 AND 39 G BLOCK ROOM NO.627, KAUTILYA CRESCENZO BLDG BHAWAN, BKC, BANDRA (E), BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, Vs. MUMBAI-400051, BANDRA(EAST) MAHARASHTRA MUMBAI-400051, MAHARASHTRA (""थ" Respondent) (अपीलाथ" Appellant) Permanent Account Number of AABCS4681D Assessee:
ITA 4264 & 4265/MUM/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assmt. Year: 2004-05 & 2005-06) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK DCIT(IT)-4(2)(2) (E), MUMBAI-400051, MUMBAI-400051, MAHARASHTRA MAHARASHTRA
(अपीलाथ" Appellant) (""थ" Respondent) Permanent Account Number of AABCS4681D Assessee:
Shri Porus Kaka, Ld. Senior िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee Counsel & Manish Kanth, represented by: Cousnel, instructed by Shri
ITA 4247 & 4275/MUM/2025 ITA 4264 & 4265/MUM/2025 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK Vijay Budhwani [authorised signatory of Standard
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026