VICHAR VINIMAY NYAS ,GURGAON vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS , CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) rejected the applications without due consideration and a proper application of mind. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act were rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for non-compliance. The assessee contended that they were not given a proper opportunity to be heard due to communication issues.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity of being heard before the rejection of its applications for registration under Section 12A and 80G. Whether the rejection was based on due consideration of facts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii),Section 80G(5)(ii),Section 12AB/(1)(b)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
twiआयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िद�ी पीठ�, नई िद�ी INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES, ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.2989 & 2990/DEL/2026 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2026-27) VICHAR VINIMAY NYAS CIT EXEMPTIONS 1962/3, NEW MATA ROAD, ROOM NO.- 1, 5TH FLOOR, CR RAJEEV NAGAR,, GURGAON- Vs. BUILDING, SECTOR-17E 122001, HARYANA CHANDIGARH-160017, अपीलाथ� Appellant ��थ� Respondent Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AABTV8367L
अपीलाथ� �ारा/Appellant represented by: CA Baldev Raj & CA Maneesh Upneja ��थ� �ारा/Respondent represented by: Shri Sher Singh, CIT(DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 08.07.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 17.07.2026 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(E)] both dated 24.02.2026 passed under section 12AB/(1)(b)(ii) and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2026-27. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The appeal of the assessee vides ITA No.2989/Del/2026 is regarding the rejection of its request filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act. The appeal of the assessee vides ITA No.2990/Del/2026 is regarding the rejection of its request filed under section 80G(5)(ii) of the Act. As both the appeals are of the same assessee concerning common issues of rejection of its application under section 12A and 80G, they were heard together and for the purposes of convenience, adjudicated by this common order.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that its right to natural justice has been violated in as much as due opportunity of being heard has not been given before rejecting its request for grant of registration u/s 12A and 80G of the Act. The ld. Counsel accordingly requested that it be provided one last chance to defend its case and, the matter be considered for remission back to the ld. CIT(E). The ld. Counsel submitted that the non-compliance was primarily attributable to the fact that the Revenue’s communication were sent either on different address or to the email of earlier professional. The ld. Counsel assured that full compliance shall be made to the statutory notices issued by the Revenue authorities.
The ld. DR placed reliance upon the orders of the lower authorities. It was contended that the emails send by the Department were apparently read by the receiver alluding towards their due receipt.
We have heard rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We have noted that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected applications of the assessee without due consideration of facts on records alluding towards a prima facie non-application of mind. We have noted that the ld. CIT(E) has dismissed assessee’s application for grant of registration under section 12A and u/s 80G purely on account of non-compliance of the assessee. It is the case of the assessee that all the documents which were required to have been produced before the ld. CIT(E) are now available in assessee’s possession and that on last opportunity of being heard and defend its case be accorded. The argument of Ld. DR about reading of the impugned mails do not hold much water since as they were directed to earlier professional, naturally they would have been read by such professional only and who did not inform the assessee. Reasonable opportunity of being heard is right of every tax payer. Be that as it may be in the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to set-aside the impugned orders of the ld. CIT(E) and remit the matter of grant of registration u/s 12A as well as u/s 80G back to ld. CIT(E) for adjudication de novo in accordance with law. Due opportunity of being heard shall be given to the assessee. The assessee shall comply with all the statutory notices and any non-compliance shall be adversely viewed. Accordingly, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No.2989/Del/2026 and vide ITA No. 2990/Del/2026 are allowed for statistical purposes.
Finally, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17th July, 2026. Sd/- Sd/- [KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL] [AMITABH SHUKLA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 17.07.2026 Shekhar
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026