KARAN MEHTA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 29.1,, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the assessment order under section 143(3) did not modify the intimation under section 143(1). The disallowance of set-off of short-term capital loss was based on the fact that the returns were filed belatedly, making the claim ineligible for set-off as per Section 80 of the Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a belated original return and a revised return beyond the due date. The Assessing Officer disallowed the set-off of short-term capital loss against short-term capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, stating losses claimed in belated returns are not eligible for set-off or carry-forward.
What were the issues?
Whether short-term capital loss can be set off against short-term capital gains when the original and revised returns are filed belatedly. Whether the appeal is maintainable when the assessment order under section 143(3) does not modify the intimation under section 143(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 70,Section 74,Section 80,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 143(1),Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2018-19 dated 28.10.2025. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal:
"
For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have allowed adjustment of Short-Term Capital Loss (STCL) of Rs. 11,55,130/- against Short Term Capital Gains of Rs. 10,03,290/- and directed A.O to allow carry forward of balance short-term capital loss of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 70
- Nipro India Corporation Pvt Ltd, Pune vs DCIT Satara Circle, SataraITA 2723/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Travel Food Services Limited (As M/S. Snvk… vs DCIT, Circle 8(3)(1), MumbaiITA 459/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Apoletto Asia Ltd., Mumbai vs DCIT (International Tax) 1(1)(1), MumbaiITA 3088/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2023-24
- Kushal Narendra Desai, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC6(1), MumbaiITA 5231/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Tulika Prem Devidayal, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 26(1), MumbaiITA 4938/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026