TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES LIMITED (AS M/S. SNVK HOSPITALITY AND MANAGEMENT PVT LTD MERGED WITH TRAVEL FOOD SERVICE LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 8(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that crucial facts regarding the purchase and sale of shares, including any potential arrangements between entities and the timing of transactions, needed further examination. Therefore, the matter was set aside to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a short-term capital loss of Rs. 6,13,29,000/- on the sale of shares. The Assessing Officer disallowed this loss, viewing the transaction as a 'colourable device' to set off long-term capital gains.
What were the issues?
Whether the short-term capital loss claimed by the assessee was a genuine business transaction or a colourable device to evade tax. The need for a thorough factual investigation into the circumstances surrounding the share transactions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH; MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M :
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [‘Ld.CIT(A)’], dated 12.01.2026, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21, wherein the Assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:
“1 The Ld Faceless CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in disallowing short term capital loss of Rs.6,13,29,000/-. The action in unjustified and unwarranted as the los
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 70
- Nipro India Corporation Pvt Ltd, Pune vs DCIT Satara Circle, SataraITA 2723/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Apoletto Asia Ltd., Mumbai vs DCIT (International Tax) 1(1)(1), MumbaiITA 3088/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2023-24
- Karan Mehta, Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 29.1, KolkataITA 3057/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed20 Jul 2026AY 2018-2019
- Kushal Narendra Desai, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC6(1), MumbaiITA 5231/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Tulika Prem Devidayal, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 26(1), MumbaiITA 4938/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026