NAXALBARI SARADA SHISHU TEERTHA,SILIGURI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA,, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an inadvertent error in mentioning the wrong sub-clause in the application form should not be a ground for rejecting an already granted approval. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable entity, applied for approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, noting the assessee lacked prior approval under the old regime before April 1, 2021, and thus was ineligible.
What were the issues?
Whether an inadvertent error in an application form for approval under Section 80G can lead to the rejection of an already granted approval. The eligibility of the assessee for approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) based on prior approvals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.2009/KOL/2026 Naxalbari Sarada Shishu Teertha, CIT(Exemption), C/o Sujit Das Dayaramjote, Vs. Kolkata Naxalbari, Siliguri, Darjeeling - 734429, West Bengal [PAN: AABAN6269J] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Rajeeva Kumar and Shri Giridhar Dhelia, AR Respondent by: Ms Ranu Biswas, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 21.07.2026 Date of Pronouncement 14.08.2026
O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.03.2026 of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “ld. CIT(E)”) passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee is a charitable entity, registered as charitable organization and granted approval u/s 80G(5)(i) of the Act for A.Y. 2022-23. The assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s 80G(5)(ii) of the Act. The ld. CIT(E), on verification of application of the assessee, found that assessee does not possess any approval
ITA No.2009/Kol/2026 Naxalbari Sarada Shishu Teertha vs. CIT(E) u/s 80G of the Act under the old regime prior to 01.04.2021. Hence, he is not eligible for approval u/s 80G(5)(i) of the Act.
Being aggrieved, dissatisfied, the assessee preferred appeal before us. The learned Authorized Representative (ld. AR) submits that due to the inadvertent error in section of sub-clause while filing initial application in Form No.10A, wrong section has been mentioned that cannot be fatal and cannot be a ground for rejection of approval which has already been granted. The ld. AR submits that while passing the order, the ld. CIT(E) erred in law that the approval granted u/s 80G(5)(i) of the Act in void ab initio as it is obtained by submitting wrong facts, ignoring the facts submitted with the Form No.10A by the assessee. The ld. AR submits that appeal of the assessee be remitted back to the file of ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration as mentioning of wrong section cannot be a ground to reject the approval which has already been granted.
The learned Commissioner of Income-tax - Departmental Representative (ld. CIT-DR) did not raise any objection.
Upon hearing the submission of the ld. AR of the representative parties and on perusal of the facts, it appears that ld. CIT(E) has rejected the approval as it has been mentioned the wrong section. It is a fact that assessee is a charitable entity and he has been granted approval u/s 80G(5)(i) of the Act for the A.Y. 2022-23 to A.Y. 2026-27. We find force in the argument in the assessee that due to the error in the selection of sub-clause while filing application in Form No.10AB cannot be a ground to reject the application for approval which has already been granted. Accordingly, we remit the appeal of the assessee to the file of ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
ITA No.2009/Kol/2026 Naxalbari Sarada Shishu Teertha vs. CIT(E) 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 14/08/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar) (Pradip Kumar Choubey) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Kolkata, Dated: 14/08/2026 SAMANTA आदेश�ȧĤǓ�ͧ �ͪ �\ Ē ȯͪ��/Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. \ �Ȣ�ȡ�ȸ/ The Appellant 2. Ĥ×��ȸ/ The Respondent 3. Ȳ�Ȳͬ��आयकर] �ǕÈ�/ Concerned CIT 4. आयकर] �ǕÈ�(अपील) / The CIT(A) 5. ��ȡ�Ȣ�ĤǓ�Ǔ�ͬ �, आयकर\ �Ȣ�ȣ�\ͬ ����,/ DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. �ȡ�[फाईल/ Guard file
BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Deputy Registrar, ITAT, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(i)
- Shree Amrutvahini Gramvikas Mandal… vs Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, PuneITA 3139/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8677/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S N Shah A N Damanwala B B Dalia Surat V S… vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8650/MUM/2026[2027-2028]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2027-2028
- S N Shah A N Damanwala B B Dalia Surat V S… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8649/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026