SADAFULI FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE ACIT, VAPI CIRCLE, VAPI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a revised return is required to claim additional TDS credit and that disallowances under Section 14A cannot be rectified under Section 154 if there is no mistake apparent from the record. Therefore, the CIT(A)'s order was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought rectification for disallowance under Section 14A and short credit of TDS. The Assessing Officer rejected the rectification application, stating that a revised return was necessary for TDS credit and that Section 14A disallowances were not rectifiable under Section 154. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether a revised return is mandatory for claiming TDS credit and if disallowances under Section 14A are rectifiable under Section 154.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay&
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-4, Mumbai [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] both dated 31/10/2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2009-10 and 2010-11. Both the appeals have common facts and grounds, therefore, both appeals were clubbed and heard together and being decided by this common order. In ITA No. 1332/Srt/2025 Sadafuli Finvest P Ltd. Vs ACIT for the A.Y. 2009-10, the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
EXCESS DISALLOWANCE OF RS. 1,68,000 UNDER SECTION 14A OF THE ACT
1 On the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026