ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORPORATE CIRCLE 1 1, CHENNAI vs. JAIN RESOURCE RECYCLING LIMITED, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The assessee company adjusted unrealized Mark to Market (MTM) gains on derivative contracts in its computation of income. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this adjustment, treating it as taxable income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition made by the AO.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that unrealized MTM gains on forward contracts, as per ICDS VI and Section 43AA of the Income Tax Act, are recognized only at the time of settlement and not merely because they are accounted for in the books as per AS-11. Therefore, the addition made by the AO was incorrect.
What were the issues?
Whether unrealized Mark to Market (MTM) gains on derivative contracts are taxable at the time of recognition in books or at the time of settlement, considering the provisions of Section 43AA and ICDS VI.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: These appeals by the Revenue are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 01.10.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2022- 23
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43AA
- Raj Gems, Mumbai vs ACIT, 19(3), MumbaiITA 2555/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dimagi Software Innovations Private… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 28(1), New…ITA 5894/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Jain Resource Recycling Limited, ChennaiITA 1683/CHNY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- M/S. Sakura Autoparts India Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Circle-3(1), ChennaiITA 1475/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed3 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Circle - 3 3 1, Mumbai vs Jamnagar Utilities and Power Pvt Ltd, MumbaiITA 5312/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed4 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026