DIMAGI SOFTWARE INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 28(1), NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the assessment order which included corporate tax additions and transfer pricing adjustments. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) had issued directions regarding the use of segmental information for comparables and working capital adjustments, which the assessee argued were not followed by the Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO/TPO did not deliberately defy DRP directions. However, due to non-availability of segmental data for some comparables and lack of supporting evidence for corporate issues, the matter was restored to the AO/TPO for recomputation. The assessee was directed to furnish necessary details for working capital adjustments and corporate issues.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO/TPO followed the binding directions of the DRP, and whether the disallowances for GST, TDS, and foreign exchange loss were justified due to lack of supporting evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 10B(2),Section 10B(3),Section 43AA,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 270A,Section 153
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, I: NEW DELHI
Before: Ms. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
Per Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member:
This appeal by the assessee is against the final assessment order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the DC/ACIT (TP) 1(2)(1),Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ld. AO’) under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), pursuant to the directions of the Hon'ble Dispute
ITA no.- 5894/Del/2024 Dimagi So"ware Innova"ons Pvt. Ltd. Resolution Panel-1, New Delhi (DRP) order dated 28.03.2024 for the Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are reproduced as under:
“1. That the Assessment or
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026