AVENDUS ENHANCED RETURN FUND,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 23(1), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, an AIF, inadvertently made a disallowance under Section 14A of Rs. 14,89,18,556 in its original and revised returns, while its Form 3CD filed earlier correctly reported a disallowance of Rs. 10,00,000. The assessee sought to correct this mistake during assessment proceedings.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the Assessing Officer's power to entertain claims outside a revised return is limited (as per Goetze (India) Ltd.), appellate authorities can entertain legitimate claims not made through a revised return. The matter was restored to the AO for verification of the assessee's claim.
What were the issues?
Whether a disallowance under Section 14A can be corrected by the assessee during assessment proceedings when an error was made in the original and revised returns, and whether appellate authorities have the power to entertain such corrected claims.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 115BBDA,Section 10(34),Section 139(1),Section 139(5),Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 250,Section 254
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
PER SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The instant appeal of the assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [for brevity “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2020-21, date of order 03.10.2025. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Assessment
ITA 9151/MUM/2025 AVENDUS ENHANCED RETURN FUND
Uni
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026