DELHI POLICE MARTYRS FUND,DELHI vs. ITO WARD EXEMPTION 1(3), DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessees were not given a proper opportunity of being heard. Therefore, the matters were set aside to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh consideration with a direction to grant a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessees applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The applications were dismissed by the CIT(E) due to alleged non-furnishing of additional details and clarifications by the assessees.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly considered the applications and provided adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessees before rejecting them for registration and approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA Nos. 5317/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) Delhi Police Education Vs. DCIT Fund, 8th Floor, MSO Circle Exemption 1(1), Building, Delhi Police Head Delhi Quarters I P Estate, Delhi- 110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AACAD8780F ITA No. 5318/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) ITA Nos. 5319/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) Delhi Police Welfare Society, Vs. DCIT 6th Floor, MSO Building, Circle Exemption 1(1), Delhi Police Head Quarters Delhi I P Estate, Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABAD7834R ITA No. 5320/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) ITA Nos. 5321/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) Delhi Police Martyr’s Fund, Vs. ITO MSO Building, Delhi Police Ward Exemption 1(3), Head Quarters I P Estate, Delhi Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABAD4893J Assessee by : Sh. Sandeep Goel, Adv Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Mahajan, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing 23/06/2026 Date of pronouncement 06/08/2026
2 ITA Nos. 5317 to 5321/Del/2026 Delhi Police Education Fund Vs. DCIT
O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, J. M.: The bunch of the Appeals filed by different Assessee’s are arising
out of the orders issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax,
(Exemption) (Ld. (CIT(E)’ for short)-Delhi whereby and whereudner the
applications in the Form 10AB for registration under Section
12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) and/or
applications seeking regular approval under Section 80G(5) (ii)
preferred by the Assessees stood dismissed.
Having regard to the identical question of law and fact involved
in the matters these are heard analogously and are being disposed of
by a common order for the sake of convenience.
It is the case of the Revenue that though the Assessees were given
opportunity to file the additional details/clarification/documents, the
same was not furnished by the Assessees. Further that since the
documents/details sought for were also not attached with Form No.
10AB, necessary verification in support of the genuineness of the
activities, charitable objects and commencement of the activities could
not be completed and, therefore, the applications for grant of
registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) were rejected. Similarly
applications for grant of approval under Section 80G(5) stood rejected.
3 ITA Nos. 5317 to 5321/Del/2026 Delhi Police Education Fund Vs. DCIT
It is the case of the Assessees that though the most of the relevant
documents were furnished before the authorities below, the same were
not considered in its proper perspective by the Ld. CIT(E) and without
giving further opportunity of being heard to the respective assessees,
the applications stood rejected.
Under these facts and circumstances of the matter, the Ld.
Counsel appearing for the Assessees submitted before us that since
the Assessees were not given proper opportunity of being heard to
represent their cases before the Ld. CIT(E) effectively, the matters be
sent to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for consideration of the same afresh;
such prayer was not objected by the Ld. DR with all his fairness.
Having heard the Ld. Counsels appearing for the parties and
having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matters in order to
prevent the miscarriage of justice, we, therefore, set aside the issues to
the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction upon him to grant reasonable
opportunity of being heard to the Assessees while considering their
case effectively. The Assessees are further directed to furnish all the
relevant details as sought for by the Ld. CIT(E). Upon considering the
evidences on record and any further evidence which the Assessees
may choose to file during the course of hearing, the Ld. CIT(E) is
directed to dispose of the applications as above by passing speaking
orders. We also make it clear that in the event the Assessees do not
4 ITA Nos. 5317 to 5321/Del/2026 Delhi Police Education Fund Vs. DCIT
cooperate with the Ld. CIT(E), the said authority would be at liberty to
proceed and finalize the issues strictly in accordance with law.
In the result, appeals filed by the Assessee’s are allowed for
statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 06/08/2026. Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 06/08/2026 R. Naheed, Sr PS Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026