DCIT-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made on account of disallowance of payments to educational institutions and survey expenditure. The assessee, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., had claimed these expenditures as business expenses.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, following a coordinate bench's decision in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year. The Tribunal found that the facts and circumstances were identical and the Revenue had not pointed out any distinguishing features.
What were the issues?
Whether payments to educational institutions for employee welfare and survey expenditure incurred in connection with mineral oil business are allowable as business deductions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
Before: BEENA PILLAI, HON’BLE & ARUN KHODPIA, HON’BLE
PER SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Present appeal filed by the Revenue arises out of the order passed by NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 26/06/2024, for A.Y. 2018-19, on the following grounds of appeal:-
“1. “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as in law, the Learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.30,74,85,064/- made on account of disallowance u/s. 40A(9) of ex
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(9)
- The Kukarwada Nag Sah Bank Ltd, Kukarvada… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 2037/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Sessoon Dock Matsya Ganga Co Op Credit… vs ITO Ward 26(2)(1), MumbaiITA 7159/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Jun 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT -CC- 1 (4), Mumbai vs Grasim Industries Limited (Successor to…ITA 1513/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Grasim Industries Limited ( As… vs DCIT Central Circle-1(4), MumbaiITA 1112/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2014-15
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs M/S. Chemplast Sanmar Limited, ChennaiITA 2627/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026