DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CHENNAI vs. M/S. CHEMPLAST SANMAR LIMITED, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance for gratuity and benevolent fund contributions, and the addition under Section 14A. However, the deletion of CSR expenses was set aside and remanded to the AO for verification.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted additions made by the AO. The additions included disallowance of provision for gratuity, contribution to a benevolent fund, disallowance under Section 14A, and CSR expenses.
What were the issues?
The primary issues involved the deductibility of provision for gratuity and benevolent fund contributions, the applicability of Section 14A for exempt income, and the deductibility of CSR expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40A(7),Section 43B,Section 40A(9),Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 37(1),Section 135
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.359 citing56 Taxmann.com 391 · 2006 · HC
- CIT v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.252 citing54 Taxmann.com 109 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Madras Refineries Ltd.94 citing266 ITR 170 · 2004 · HC
- HT Media Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax69 citing85 Taxmann.com 113 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (herein after the ‘CIT(A)’) dated 24.07.2025 for the assessment year 2017-18. :- 2 -:
Brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(7)
- DCIT, Central Cricle 29, New Delhi vs M/S Panacea Biotech Limited, DelhiITA 1518/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Cargoes Technology (India) Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer (ITO) - Ward 6(2)(1)…ITA 2851/MUM/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- DCIT, Jabalpur vs Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, SeoniITA 161/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Budge Budge Nangi Cooperative Bank Limited… vs ITO, Ward 26(1), KolkataITA 767/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- The Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 155/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026