DCIT CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR vs. M/S GONDWANA ENGINEERS LIMITED, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to establish eligibility for Section 80-IA deduction due to lack of evidence and procedural non-compliance. It also held that delayed deposit of employees' PF/ESI contributions attracts disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) as per the Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Services.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80-IA for developing water and sewage treatment plants, which the AO disallowed. The AO also disallowed delayed deposit of employees' PF/ESI contributions. The CIT(A) allowed the 80-IA deduction and deleted the disallowance for PF/ESI contributions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA as a developer or a contractor, and whether delayed deposit of employees' PF/ESI contributions beyond statutory due dates leads to disallowance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80-IA,Section 36(1)(va),Section 2(24)(x),Section 143(3),Section 139(1),Section 43B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, AM:
These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the separate orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi & Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Nagpur, (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 18/12/2024 & 10.07.2020 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”) which are emanating from the separate assessment orders dated 30.12.2018 &
ITA Nos. 80 & 93/NAG/2025 (Gondwana Engineers Ltd.) 22.12.2017 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act by the ACIT & DCIT, Circle-1, Nagpur, for the Assessment Years (AY) 2016-17 & 2015-16 respectively.
Since the facts and issues involved in both the appeals are identical, the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80-IA
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT, Central Circle- 2(4), Chennai vs Eco Protection Engineers Private Limited…ITA 597/CHNY/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Central Circle 1(1), KolkataITTPA 12/KOL/2026[2022-2023]Status: Heard11 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs ACIT-Circle- 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 3429/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026