POLPULLY AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,POLPULLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PALAKKAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the Assessing Officer to await the decision on the assessee's application for condonation of delay in filing the return. If the delay is condoned, the return and the claim for deduction will be considered as per law.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, failed to file its return of income under section 139(1) and claimed deduction under section 80P only after a notice under section 148 was issued. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction, and this was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under section 80P when the return was filed belatedly in response to a notice under section 148, and if the delay in filing the return can be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139,Section 147,Section 148,Section 119(2)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE – PRESIDENT
This stay application has been filed by Polpully Agricultural Improvement Cooperative Society Ltd. seeking a stay of demand of ₹39,81,568 arising from the assessment order passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act on 6 March 2025 for assessment year 2019–20. The demand was confirmed by the learned CIT(A) by order dated 16 October 2025, on the ground that the deduction under section 80P was denied to the assessee for non-filing of the return of income under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.
The facts show that the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026