SEMPLICE CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(1)(1), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 35DD for stamp duty related to a demerger and also had investments. The Assessing Officer disallowed a portion of expenses under Section 14A and the entire deduction claimed under Section 35DD. The CIT(A) upheld these disallowances.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no disallowance under Section 14A is permissible in the absence of exempt income. It also ruled that the deduction under Section 35DD for stamp duty related to demerger expenses should be allowed, following its own prior decision.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is valid without exempt income, and whether stamp duty paid for a demerger is deductible under Section 35DD.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 35DD,Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI JAGADISH
Per: SHRI JAGADISH, A.M.:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for Assessment Year 2018-19. The order appealed against arises from the assessment order dated 23.04.2021 passed under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act. Semplice Corporate Solutions Private Limited
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“GROUND NO. I: DISALLOWANCE U/S 14A OF THE AC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026