SURESH KHANDELWAL,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, NEW DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the rejection of books of accounts under Section 145(3) was justified, the estimation of profit by the lower authorities was not based on sound reasoning or evidence. The Tribunal restricted the addition to a lower percentage of purchases, acknowledging the assessee's involvement in suspicious transactions but also noting the revenue's failure to provide specific evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 147 based on allegations of bogus purchases and sales routed through shell entities, following a search operation on the Rajdhani Flour Mills Group. The Assessing Officer rejected the assessee's books of accounts under Section 145(3) and made an addition estimating profit at 2% of total sales.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of books of accounts and the estimation of profit by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were justified and based on proper evidence, and whether the assessment order was passed without proper jurisdiction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 145(3),Section 132,Section 127(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, “H” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK
PER AMITABH SHUKLA, AM
This bunch of three appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi, dated 11.03.2026 arising out of separate assessment orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income tax, Central Circle-3, Delhi (‘the AO’) passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026