BIKANER PUSHKARNA SAMAJ KALYAN TRUST,BIKANER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the subsequent registration under section 12AB, based on the amended trust deed, warranted a fresh examination of the 80G(5) application. The CIT(E) was directed to reconsider the application in light of the amended deed and the 12AB registration.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust's application for approval under section 80G(5) was rejected by the CIT(E) because its objects were seen as benefiting a particular community. Subsequently, the trust amended its deed and was granted registration under section 12AB(1)(b) based on these amended objects.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of 80G(5) approval based on community-specific benefits is sustainable when the trust has amended its deed and obtained subsequent registration under section 12AB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 27.12.2023 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), rejecting the assessee’s application seeking approval under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee, Bikaner Pushkarna Samaj Kalyan Trust, had sought approval under section 80G(5), which was declined by the Ld. CIT(E), inter alia, on the ground that the objects and activities of the Trust were confined to the benefit of a particular community, namely, Pushkarna Samaj. The Ld. CIT(E) further
2 Asst. Year: 2024-25 observed that the preamble of the original trust deed continued to restrict the beneficiaries to the said community and that the subsequent supplementary deed did no
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026