RAJKUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. CIRCLE 2(1)(1) AGRA, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the notice issued under Section 148 was bad in law due to an invalid sanction under Section 151. The sanctioning authority showed a non-application of mind, making the subsequent assessment order void. Therefore, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80GGC for a donation to a political party. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, treating the donation as bogus and adding it to the assessee's income. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 due to an alleged invalid sanction under Section 151. The secondary issues involved the disallowance of the Section 80GGC deduction and additions to income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80GGC,Section 148,Section 147,Section 151,Section 149(1)(b),Section 69C,Section 10(13A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (SMC
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGHBRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER:SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 06.01.2026 passed in appeal No NFAC/2018-19/10429876 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)/ NFAC(Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2019-20, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal.
The brief facts of the case are that assessee filed his return of income for A.Y. 2019-20 on 06.07.2019, declaring total income of Rs. 10,39,650/-. The case was reopened by issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 12.04.2023 for examining assessee’s claim of deduction and exemption. Assessee filed return on 08.05.2023 in c
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80GGC
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mazharkhan Nasrullahkhan Pathan, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 2342/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026