THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA

ITA 155/VIZ/2026Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 August 2026AY 2022-237 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT with a delay of 78 days due to administrative reasons. The assessee had also failed to prosecute its appeals before the lower authorities, leading to ex-parte orders.

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing sufficient cause. It also set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) for non-prosecution, directing a fresh adjudication on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without deciding on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 139(8A),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 40A(7)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Pronounced: 19.08.2026

PER SHRI MANJUNATHA G., ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

These appeals are filed by the assessee against two separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“Ld.CIT(A)”], National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), both dated 22.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2021-22 and 2022-23 respectively.

2.

At the outset, we find that

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 139(8A)

All 60 judgments and leading authorities on Section 139(8A) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →