THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT with a delay of 78 days due to administrative reasons. The assessee had also failed to prosecute its appeals before the lower authorities, leading to ex-parte orders.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing sufficient cause. It also set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) for non-prosecution, directing a fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without deciding on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139(8A),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 40A(7)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
PER SHRI MANJUNATHA G., ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals are filed by the assessee against two separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“Ld.CIT(A)”], National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), both dated 22.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2021-22 and 2022-23 respectively.
At the outset, we find that
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139(8A)
- Arif Aeiyubbhai Vahora, Anand vs The ITO, Ward-1, AnandITA 739/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Sri Shivaganga Yoga Centre, Abhistavara… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, HubliITA 2117/BANG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Marut Prasanth Gogineni, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 3(1)…ITA 268/VIZ/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- The Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 155/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Banagram Skus Limited, Banagram vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 41(1), NadiaITA 1691/KOL/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026