UDIT INFRAWORLD PRIVATE LIMITED & PATH(INDIA) LIMITED,REWA vs. PCIT -1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT's order under Section 263 was not justified as it did not demonstrate that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The PCIT also changed his stand on the grounds for revision.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) initiated proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to revise an assessment order. The PCIT believed the assessee failed to deduct tax at source (TDS) on payments made to a subsidiary company.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT's order under Section 263 was valid when the assessment order was not demonstrably erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, and if the PCIT had jurisdiction to invoke Section 201.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “DB”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI, GD PADMAHSHALI
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT)- Jabalpur-1, dated 21.02.2024, passed u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), pertaining to the assessment year 2018-19. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. The learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax — 1, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as `the learned POT') has erred in initiating proceedings under section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') since when the assessment order passed by the learned
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026